Anonymous page analytics

With your permission we measure public page views, referral domains, campaign labels, browser time zones, page journeys and outbound domains. No names, emails, IP addresses or private learning content. Retained 90 days. You can opt out at any time from the footer.

Psychological Safetyat Work
All insights
Job DemandsAustraliaEN

Queensland WHS Regulation: Addressing High and Low Job Demands

An analysis of how Queensland work health and safety standards govern the dual extremes of excessive workloads and sustained monotony in organizational job design.

October 28, 2026 · 656 words
Share on XShare on LinkedIn

Editorial hold — human review pending.

Country: Australia. Research snapshot: 2026-10-20. Source / development date: 2023-04-01.

Unresolved verification flags

Check the current Queensland code version, commencement and its legal status locally. Do not generalise Queensland requirements to every Australian jurisdiction.

Resolve these limitations and the article-specific legal checklist before approval. This draft is educational information, not legal advice.

Australia | Approved Code Development Date: 1 April 2023 | Research Snapshot Date: 20 October 2026.

Defining the Hazards of High and Low Job Demands

Under Queensland’s approved code, Managing the risk of psychosocial hazards at work Code of Practice 2022, job demands represent a primary category of psychosocial risk [source: launch-source-04]. The code explicitly defines job demands as encompassing both sustained high demands and sustained very low demands, both of which can lead to psychological injury if not managed so far as is reasonably practicable.

High job demands involve sustained or intense levels of physical, mental, or emotional effort that chronically exceed a worker’s capacity [source: launch-source-04]. Common examples include severe time pressure, role overload, unachievable deadlines, high vigilance requirements, challenging shift rosters, and expectations to remain responsive outside standard working hours. Conversely, low job demands involve sustained, highly monotonous work with minimal cognitive engagement [source: launch-source-04]. A single role can feature an unhealthy combination of both extremes—such as long periods of unstimulating monitoring punctuated by sudden bursts of intense emergency response.

Queensland Legal Requirements and the Reasonably Practicable Standard

Under the Queensland Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (WHS Act) and Part 3.1 and Part 3.2 (Division 11) of the Work Health and Safety Regulation 2011, a person conducting a business or undertaking (PCBU) is legally required to eliminate psychosocial risks so far as is reasonably practicable, or minimise them where elimination is impossible [source: launch-source-04].

Determining what is reasonably practicable under section 18 of the WHS Act requires weighing the likelihood of harm, the severity of the potential psychological injury, the availability of control measures, and associated costs [source: launch-source-04]. Under section 26A of the WHS Act, duty holders must follow the approved code or establish equivalent or higher safety standards. Furthermore, company directors and senior leaders qualifying as officers under section 27 must proactively verify that the PCBU provides adequate resources to manage excessive or deficient demands [source: launch-source-04].

Executive Governance Recommendations for Demand Management

To align organizational design with safety standards, executive teams should evaluate the following governance recommendations:

  1. Workload and Resourcing Audits: Management should establish routine oversight of overtime, task backlogs, and leave accruals. For instance, in a hypothetical software engineering firm, an executive committee could monitor sprint deadlines to ensure developers are not subjected to consecutive periods of unmanageable cognitive overload.
  2. Task Variety and Role Design: In environments characterized by sustained monotony, such as document processing or repetitive quality checking, leadership should recommend structured task rotation and skill-building initiatives to restore engagement and cognitive balance.
  3. Structured Worker Consultation: PCBUs must consult workers when identifying hazards and deciding on control measures under sections 47 through 49 of the WHS Act [source: launch-source-04]. Using anonymous feedback loops and workload committees can surface unreasonable task expectations before stress responses manifest as formal claims.

Legal review required

Prior to institutional adoption or policy finalisation, legal counsel must conduct a specific verification review addressing the following points:

  • Confirm that the entity's operational scope is governed by the Queensland WHS Act and that workers are not subject to separate federal or industry-specific safety schemes.
  • Verify whether any amendments to the Queensland WHS Regulation regarding job design or demand thresholds have commenced following the code's 1 April 2023 commencement.
  • Ensure internal operational recommendations concerning working hours or workload monitoring are clearly distinguished from statutory duties.
  • Any unsupported or uncertain legal assertions must be completely resolved before release.
  • This document provides educational information, does not constitute certified legal advice, and has not undergone formal legal verification.